Connect with us

International

Trump will have to mortgage or sell assets with discounts to pay the bond of $464 million

Former President of the United States Donald Trump again insisted that he does not have the liquidity to pay the deposit of 464 million dollars imposed on him by Judge Arthur Engoron of New York, unless he resorts to mortgage or sell “large assets, perhaps at a balance price.”

After his lawyers argued on Monday in a letter to Engoron that it was “impossible” for his client to collect that amount, on Tuesday Trump turned to his network, Truth Social, to charge again against the judge and his “ridiculous decision,” in reference to the bail imposed on February 16 and which gives the tycoon a term until March 25 to complete the payment.

“No one has ever heard anything like it. I would be forced to mortgage or sell large assets, even at a balance price, and if I then win on appeal, they will have disappeared – he complained – WITCH HUNT. ELECTORAL INTERFERENCE!”, he wrote with his usual capital letters.

Trump’s lawyers and his co-defendants in the fraud case argued on Monday the impossibility of collecting that money: “The continuous and diligent efforts of the defendants have shown that a bail for the total amount of the sentence is ‘a practical impossibility,’” the lawyers explained in the letter to the judge. In addition, the legal team pointed out that they had approached approximately 30 insurance companies through four different corridors and that they have spent “untless hours negotiating,” but they have not gotten an insurer.

In New York, defendants in civil cases must pay bail in the amount of at least 110% of the amount of the ruling to delay the payment of the fine while they appeal.

Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

Earlier this month, Trump paid a bail of almost $92 million to appeal the $83.3 million in damages that a jury ordered him to pay to the writer E. Jean Carroll for a case other than defamation by denying his accusations of sexual assault.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_300x250

International

Venezuela Debates Broad Amnesty Law Covering 27 Years of Chavismo

Venezuela’s Parliament began debating on Thursday a sweeping amnesty bill that would cover the 27 years of Chavismo in power, while explicitly excluding serious human rights violations and crimes against humanity.

The proposed legislation, titled the “Amnesty Law for Democratic Coexistence,” was introduced by interim President Delcy Rodríguez, who assumed power following the capture of Nicolás Maduro during a U.S. military operation.

The legislative session was convened for Thursday afternoon, with lawmakers holding an initial discussion focused on the general principles of the bill. This phase precedes a consultation process with civil society, after which the proposal will move to a final debate examining each article individually.

According to a draft of the bill obtained by AFP, the amnesty would apply to individuals accused of crimes such as “treason,” “terrorism,” and “incitement to hatred,” charges that were frequently brought against political prisoners over the past decades. The scope also includes offenses ranging from acts of rebellion to punishments imposed for social media posts or messages sent through private messaging services.

The bill’s explanatory text emphasizes reconciliation, stating that it seeks to move away from “vengeance, retaliation, and hatred” in favor of “opening a path toward reconciliation.”

Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

However, the proposal explicitly excludes from its benefits crimes such as “serious human rights violations, crimes against humanity, war crimes, intentional homicide, corruption, and drug trafficking.”

These exclusions, the text notes, are based on strict compliance with the Venezuelan Constitution, which already prohibits granting amnesties or pardons for such offenses.

Continue Reading

International

Díaz-Canel Calls for Talks With Washington Without Pressure as U.S. Tightens Oil Sanctions

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel said on Thursday that his government is willing to engage in dialogue with the United States, provided that talks take place on equal terms and without pressure.

“Cuba is prepared to hold a dialogue with the United States on any issue that either side wishes to discuss,” Díaz-Canel said during a press conference broadcast nationwide on radio and television.

He stressed, however, that such dialogue would only be possible “without pressure, without preconditions, on the basis of equality, and with full respect for our sovereignty, independence, and self-determination.” The Cuban leader added that discussions should avoid issues that could be interpreted as interference in the country’s internal affairs.

Díaz-Canel’s remarks come at a time when Cuba is facing growing pressure from the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, which has implemented a series of measures that have restricted the island’s access to fuel needed to generate electricity.

Washington has sought to prevent Cuba from receiving oil from Venezuela, its main ally for more than two decades, and has stepped up pressure to reduce crude shipments from Mexico. In addition, Trump signed an executive order in late January allowing the United States to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba.

Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

In that order, the U.S. president declared that Cuba represents an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to U.S. national security and foreign policy, accusing the island of aligning itself with hostile countries and actors.

Continue Reading

International

HRW Warns Trump’s Influence Has Weakened Human Rights in Latin America

Human Rights Watch (HRW) warned that the political influence and rhetoric of U.S. President Donald Trump have contributed to a deterioration of human rights conditions across Latin America and the Caribbean. In its World Report 2026, the organization stated that several governments in the region have committed abuses against migrants and citizens, or have used U.S. policies as justification to impose harsher repressive measures.

During the first year of Trump’s new term, HRW observed that multiple countries violated the rights of foreign nationals under direct pressure from Washington. Other governments deepened security strategies based on militarization, mass detentions and excessive use of force, according to the report.

“The impact of the Trump administration has undoubtedly been negative in Latin America and the Caribbean,” said Juanita Goebertus, HRW’s Americas director. However, she emphasized that “governments in the region remain responsible for defending democracy and fundamental rights, regardless of who is in power in Washington.”

HRW also reported that the United States significantly reduced cooperation funding for human rights organizations and independent media. At the same time, countries such as El Salvador, Peru and Ecuador passed laws allowing the arbitrary closure of civil society organizations and media outlets, weakening democratic systems and institutional checks and balances.

The organization further criticized what it described as a “double standard” in U.S. foreign policy, which condemns human rights violations in Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua while overlooking serious abuses committed by allies such as El Salvador, Peru and Ecuador. The report also included criticism of the U.S. military attack against Venezuela in early 2026, warning that it could strengthen Nicolás Maduro’s regime and respond primarily to U.S. political and commercial interests.

Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow
Continue Reading

Trending

Central News