Connect with us

International

Justice in Argentina suspends President Javier Milei’s labor reform, but the government appeals and doubts about its validity grow

In Argentina, an appeals court suspended the labor reform contained in President Javier Milei’s decree of necessity and urgency (DNU) No. 70/2023. While the government prepares to appeal the decision, the execution of measures related to the labor aspect included in the decree is temporarily halted.

The Labor Appeals Chamber considered that “the ‘necessity’ of adopting so many measures would not be objectively evident,” according to the document signed by two judges of the Chamber, José Alejandro Sudera and Andrea García Vior. A third magistrate, María Dora González, dissented, stating that the court does not have jurisdiction, and the case should be transferred to the administrative litigation court.

The ruling states that there are no reasons alleged that constitute an urgency “to avoid the proper intervention of the Legislative Power regarding substantive legislation.” The tribunal cited the Constitution emphatically: “The National Constitution does not allow choosing discretionary between passing a law or imposing certain material contents more quickly through a decree.”

Now, what does the labor chapter of DNU 70/2023, currently suspended by the justice, establish? Regarding this, there are two main issues that have generated controversy:

  • 8-month probation period The DNU extends the probationary period in an indefinite-term employment contract from 3 to 8 months, stating that “it will be considered probationary during the first 8 months of validity.” Additionally, the decree states that “either party may terminate the relationship during that period, without cause and without the right to compensation.”

Labor lawyer Alexander Rodríguez sees this point of the decree as a solution that “should be positive, as it encourages the entry of workers.” According to him, “companies do not hire personnel justifying that labor law is too demanding. So, instead of facilitating the entry of workers, their exit is facilitated. If the probation period is extended, there would be no fines for undeclared work or withheld contributions. Therefore, if you want more staff, you should facilitate entry, not exit.”

In contrast, labor lawyer Leandro Recalde argues that “the probationary period is a time granted to the employer to assess the suitability of the employee and gives them the possibility to terminate the employment relationship once that period is over, without the possibility of paying compensation.” Recalde asks, “How much time is really necessary to assess the employee’s suitability? What they are trying to do with this decree is distort that probationary period to eliminate or degrade the compensatory institute.”

Advertisement
20250509_dengue_728x90
20250501_vacunacion-influenza-728x90
20250501_vacunacion_vph-728x90
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
CEL
previous arrow
next arrow
  • Severance pay Milei’s DNU states: “In cases of dismissal without just cause by the employer, with or without prior notice, and after the probationary period has elapsed, the employer must pay the worker severance pay equivalent to one month’s salary for each year of service or fraction exceeding 3 months, taking as a basis for calculation the best monthly, normal, and habitual remuneration earned during the last year or during the time of service if less.”

In this regard, Recalde considers that the basic objective of the DNU is to “lower the amount of severance pay.” In this aspect, he emphasized: “The DNU reduces the compensation by attacking how the remuneration or the calculation base for compensation is calculated. That is, if the Labor Contract Law took the best monthly, normal, and habitual remuneration, the DNU excludes the Christmas bonus, semi-annual and annual bonuses, and, in the case of variable remuneration, the best remuneration is not taken, but an average.”

Labor Secretary Omar Yasin declared weeks ago on the news channel La Nación + (LN+) that the DNU “is truly an instrument to generate employment” and that “it does not reduce any worker’s rights.” Regarding severance pay, Yasin argued that the DNU includes “an objective cause for dismissal, which is participating in a block against an employer, causing damage to the employer, the company, or third parties, and, fundamentally, preventing a worker from going to his workplace and not adhering to the strike.”

A topic that has generated controversies and disagreements among different representatives of labor law has to do with the unemployment fund. In statements to LN+, Yasin stated that “another positive aspect of the DNU is the possibility of creating an unemployment fund or termination fund.” As the head of the Labor Secretary established, the termination fund is created by collective agreement. The worker will turn to that fund if dismissed to immediately collect compensation without delay.

“The most serious thing that the decree provides is the possibility that through collective bargaining, unions and business chambers can repeal the compensation system and create series funds that do not adequately protect against dismissal,” argues Recalde. From another perspective, labor lawyer Alexander Rossi maintains that the indemnity resolution by collective agreement “does not make sense” because each business and union sector will have its own agreement.

Yasin also stated that the new DNU generates compensation for discriminatory dismissal, considering sexual, ethnic, or religious orientation. In this regard, the head of the Labor Secretary argued that, in these cases, compensations increase by 50% or 100%, according to judges.

Hours after the news of the suspension of the labor reform included in the DNU became known, it was reported that the State would appeal the precautionary measure. According to a source from the Ministry of Justice of the Nation, the presentation was being prepared by the Treasury Solicitor’s Office of the Nation, led by Rodolfo Barra, a former judge of the Supreme Court. In this regard, the Ministry argues: “They are ignoring the criterion adopted by all other courts in the country, both in the city and in the interior, which sent the case to the natural and universal judge.”

Advertisement
20250509_dengue_728x90
20250501_vacunacion-influenza-728x90
20250501_vacunacion_vph-728x90
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
CEL
previous arrow
next arrow

Barra said this Wednesday in an interview on Radio con vos that “the National Labor Appeals Chamber has a bias identified with some sectors that could have been affected by the DNU, which acted outside its jurisdiction.” The Treasury Solicitor anticipated that they will take the discussion first “in the administrative litigation court,” and if they are not successful, they will go to the Supreme Court.

Now, is the precautionary measure annulled with the appeal? For labor law specialist Jorge Fontán, the State required a “reconsideration appeal” for the same appeals chamber to review the precautionary measure. In this way, Fontán explained, “After the review, that appeal goes to the Supreme Court.” The Supreme Court will deal with all precautionary measures, but when the judicial recess or vacation, during which judicial activities cease between January 1 and 31 in Argentina, ends. In fact, the court that granted the precautionary measure is a holiday court. So, as Fontán said, the Supreme Court will deal with all precautionary measures when the judicial recess ends. In this way, given that the precautionary measure does not have a suspensive effect, it remains in force according to Fontán.

For labor lawyer Alexander Rodríguez, there are two scenarios: on the one hand, the decree remains suspended until the Supreme Court says otherwise. On the other hand, “A direct presentation of the Executive Power to the Supreme Court is possible, to immediately resolve the issue due to institutional gravity.”

International

China shows at the UN its “condemnation” of Israel for the “violation of Iran’s sovereignty”

The Chinese ambassador to the United Nations, Fu Cong, showed the “condemnation” of his country against the “violation of the sovereignty, security and territorial integrity of Iran” after the air attack launched by Israel against multiple targets in that country, the official newspaper Diario del Pueblo reports this Saturday.

That media echoes Fu’s speech to the UN Security Council on Friday, in which he demanded that Israel “immediately stop all its military actions.”

“China (…) opposes the expansion of conflicts, and is deeply concerned about the serious consequences that may arise from Israel’s actions. The intensification of regional tensions does not interest any of the parties involved,” said the Chinese emissary.

Beijing called on Tel Aviv and Tehran to “resolve their disputes through political and diplomatic means, and maintain peace and stability at the regional level jointly.”

In Fu’s view, the Israeli attack will have a “negative impact” on the negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program: “China has always been committed to the peaceful resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue through dialogue and consultations, and opposes the use of force, illegal unilateral sanctions and armed attacks on peaceful nuclear facilities.”

This Friday, China had already expressed its willingness to “play a constructive role” to curb the escalation of tensions and facilitate conciliation, in line with its traditional position of active neutrality in the region’s conflicts.

The Israeli attack, which according to Tehran caused dozens of deaths, including senior military commanders and at least six nuclear scientists, targeted key facilities such as the uranium enrichment plant in Natanz. Numerous civilian casualties were also reported.

Israel justified the offensive by claiming that the Iranian regime is secretly developing a program to manufacture nuclear weapons.

For his part, Iran’s supreme leader, Ali Khamenei, promised a “severe response” and assured that the attack would reveal the “evil nature” of Israel.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres also expressed concern about the bombing, at a time when Iran and the US The United States is holding talks about the Iranian nuclear program.

Continue Reading

International

Donald Trump’s government pauses its program of indiscriminate raides against migrants

The government of US President Donald Trump has decided to pause its campaign of discretionary roundings against migrants in certain areas due to its apparent concern about the growing unpopularity of these methods, according to The New York Times newspaper on Friday.

According to an email to which the newspaper has had access and the confirmation of US officials, the Executive has ordered the Immigration and Customs Control Service (ICE) to pause the beatings that affect the agricultural industry and the hospitality industry.

The spokeswoman for the Department of Homeland Security, Tricia McLaughlin, confirmed in a statement that “the president’s instructions” will be obeyed and the portfolio will also continue to “work to get the worst illegal foreign criminals out of the streets of the United States.”

The decision points out that this campaign of discretionary arrests to try to deport large-scale immigrants is harming industries and electoral constituencies whose support Trump wants to retain for next year’s legislative elections.

The new instructions were transmitted to ICE in an email sent last Thursday asking that “all investigations/law enforcement operations be suspended in work centers in the agricultural sector (including aquaculture and meat packing plants), restaurants and hotels.”

These new guidelines come in turn after more than a week of intense protests in Los Angeles against this immigration policy and that Trump himself admitted that the raids seem to be affecting the agricultural sector, which in states like California, where beatings have intensified, depend almost exclusively on immigrant labor.

Since his return to the White House in January, Trump has implemented an aggressive policy of hard hand against immigration and as a sample of his Cabinet officials recently held a meeting with the ICE leadership to order them to carry out 3,000 arrests a day, a mandate that seems to be behind the intensification of the raids.

Continue Reading

International

Trump says he knew “everything” about the attack on Iran and assures that the dialogue remains open

US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Washington “known everything” about the Israeli attack on Iran and that the dialogue on Tehran’s nuclear program “is not dead.”

“We knew everything and I tried to avoid Iran all this humiliation and death. I tried hard to avoid it because I would have loved to see an agreement,” Trump said in an interview with Reuters.

The US president insisted on what he wrote today about the attack on social networks, where he said he gave an ultimatum of 60 days to Tehran to reach an agreement.

“We knew practically everything. We knew enough to give Iran 60 days to reach an agreement and today it is already 61 days,” he explained in the interview, in which he said he did not know what the current situation of the Iranian nuclear program is after the attack launched by Israel, which also ended the lives of key military leaders of the Persian country.

Regarding the dialogue between the US and Iran about the nuclear program of the ayatollahs, Trump assured that “he is not dead”, that “an agreement is still possible” and also recalled that on Sunday a sixth round of dialogue is scheduled in Muscat (Oman) that they consider is now in the air.

“We have a meeting with them on Sunday. Now, I’m not sure if that meeting will take place, but we have a meeting with them on Sunday,” he said.

The United States and Iran have held five rounds of talks on the Iranian nuclear program since April, with Washington demanding that Tehran discard its capabilities both to manufacture an atomic bomb and to enrich uranium, something that the ayatollahs considered unacceptable.

Both Israel and Trump himself had warned of possible preventive attacks on the Persian country due to this refusal by Iran.

Continue Reading

Trending

Central News