Iran said on Monday that it is studying the United States’ proposal on a possible nuclear agreement, but assured that it will not accept any offer that “contains radical or maximalist demands.”
“Naturally, any text or proposal must be examined and answered appropriately and in line with national interests,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Ismail Baghaei said, when questioned during his weekly press conference about the proposal that Washington sent to Tehran on Saturday through Oman.
Without offering details of the content of the American text, Baghaei stressed that the fact of having received a written proposal “does not mean its acceptance at all, it does not even imply that it is acceptable,” and reiterated that Tehran will not accept “radical demands.”
“No text that contains radical or maximalist demands, and that ignores the rights and legitimate interests of the Iranian people, will receive a positive response from us,” he said.
In this sense, the spokesman for Iranian diplomacy reiterated his country’s right to enrichment of uranium for peaceful purposes, and remarked that Tehran’s main objective in nuclear negotiations with the United States is the effective lifting of sanctions.
Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20250701_dengue_728x90
20250901_vacunacion_vsr-728x90
20250901_minsal_tetra_-728x90
20250701_vacunacion-influenza-728x90
20250701_vacunacion_vph-728x90
20250715_donacion_sangre_central_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
CEL
Baghaei added that both parties “are fully aware of the red lines of the other,” including Iran’s position of continuing with uranium enrichment within the country, despite the fact that Washington has repeatedly demanded “zero enrichment” and the dismantling of Iranian nuclear facilities.
Iran’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araqchí, reported on Saturday that his counterpart from Oman, Badr bin Hamad al Busaidi, made a brief visit to Tehran to personally deliver the US proposal. USA.
Araqchí said yesterday that the Iranian response is in the process of being prepared.
For its part, the White House has urged Iran to accept its offer to seal a nuclear agreement.
“The best thing for your interest is to accept it,” press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement on Saturday.
Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20250701_dengue_728x90
20250901_vacunacion_vsr-728x90
20250901_minsal_tetra_-728x90
20250701_vacunacion-influenza-728x90
20250701_vacunacion_vph-728x90
20250715_donacion_sangre_central_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
CEL
The US proposal was transmitted to Iran after the publication of a report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) that denounced that Tehran continues to develop the most controversial aspects of its nuclear program, with an increase of almost 50% in the production of highly enriched uranium – close to 90% necessary for military use – between February and May.
Since April 12, Iran and the United States have held five rounds of indirect contacts, sponsored by Oman, amid important disagreements over the enrichment of uranium by the Persian country.
Iran has insisted on its “inalienable” right to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes and has reiterated that it will only agree to limit its nuclear program in exchange for the total lifting of sanctions. Washington, on the other hand, demands a commitment of “zero enrichment.”
The last round of dialogue took place on Friday, May 23, and the date or place of the next meeting has not yet been defined.
Venezuela Debates Broad Amnesty Law Covering 27 Years of Chavismo
Venezuela’s Parliament began debating on Thursday a sweeping amnesty bill that would cover the 27 years of Chavismo in power, while explicitly excluding serious human rights violations and crimes against humanity.
The proposed legislation, titled the “Amnesty Law for Democratic Coexistence,” was introduced by interim President Delcy Rodríguez, who assumed power following the capture of Nicolás Maduro during a U.S. military operation.
The legislative session was convened for Thursday afternoon, with lawmakers holding an initial discussion focused on the general principles of the bill. This phase precedes a consultation process with civil society, after which the proposal will move to a final debate examining each article individually.
According to a draft of the bill obtained by AFP, the amnesty would apply to individuals accused of crimes such as “treason,” “terrorism,” and “incitement to hatred,” charges that were frequently brought against political prisoners over the past decades. The scope also includes offenses ranging from acts of rebellion to punishments imposed for social media posts or messages sent through private messaging services.
The bill’s explanatory text emphasizes reconciliation, stating that it seeks to move away from “vengeance, retaliation, and hatred” in favor of “opening a path toward reconciliation.”
Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20250701_dengue_728x90
20250901_vacunacion_vsr-728x90
20250901_minsal_tetra_-728x90
20250701_vacunacion-influenza-728x90
20250701_vacunacion_vph-728x90
20250715_donacion_sangre_central_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
CEL
However, the proposal explicitly excludes from its benefits crimes such as “serious human rights violations, crimes against humanity, war crimes, intentional homicide, corruption, and drug trafficking.”
These exclusions, the text notes, are based on strict compliance with the Venezuelan Constitution, which already prohibits granting amnesties or pardons for such offenses.
Díaz-Canel Calls for Talks With Washington Without Pressure as U.S. Tightens Oil Sanctions
Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel said on Thursday that his government is willing to engage in dialogue with the United States, provided that talks take place on equal terms and without pressure.
“Cuba is prepared to hold a dialogue with the United States on any issue that either side wishes to discuss,” Díaz-Canel said during a press conference broadcast nationwide on radio and television.
He stressed, however, that such dialogue would only be possible “without pressure, without preconditions, on the basis of equality, and with full respect for our sovereignty, independence, and self-determination.” The Cuban leader added that discussions should avoid issues that could be interpreted as interference in the country’s internal affairs.
Díaz-Canel’s remarks come at a time when Cuba is facing growing pressure from the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump, which has implemented a series of measures that have restricted the island’s access to fuel needed to generate electricity.
Washington has sought to prevent Cuba from receiving oil from Venezuela, its main ally for more than two decades, and has stepped up pressure to reduce crude shipments from Mexico. In addition, Trump signed an executive order in late January allowing the United States to impose tariffs on countries that sell oil to Cuba.
Advertisement
20250501_mh_noexigencia_dui_728x90
20250701_dengue_728x90
20250901_vacunacion_vsr-728x90
20250901_minsal_tetra_-728x90
20250701_vacunacion-influenza-728x90
20250701_vacunacion_vph-728x90
20250715_donacion_sangre_central_728x90
20231124_etesal_728x90_1
20230601_agenda_primera_infancia_728X90
domfuturo_netview-728x90
20240604_dom_728x90
CEL
In that order, the U.S. president declared that Cuba represents an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to U.S. national security and foreign policy, accusing the island of aligning itself with hostile countries and actors.
HRW Warns Trump’s Influence Has Weakened Human Rights in Latin America
Human Rights Watch (HRW) warned that the political influence and rhetoric of U.S. President Donald Trump have contributed to a deterioration of human rights conditions across Latin America and the Caribbean. In its World Report 2026, the organization stated that several governments in the region have committed abuses against migrants and citizens, or have used U.S. policies as justification to impose harsher repressive measures.
During the first year of Trump’s new term, HRW observed that multiple countries violated the rights of foreign nationals under direct pressure from Washington. Other governments deepened security strategies based on militarization, mass detentions and excessive use of force, according to the report.
“The impact of the Trump administration has undoubtedly been negative in Latin America and the Caribbean,” said Juanita Goebertus, HRW’s Americas director. However, she emphasized that “governments in the region remain responsible for defending democracy and fundamental rights, regardless of who is in power in Washington.”
HRW also reported that the United States significantly reduced cooperation funding for human rights organizations and independent media. At the same time, countries such as El Salvador, Peru and Ecuador passed laws allowing the arbitrary closure of civil society organizations and media outlets, weakening democratic systems and institutional checks and balances.
The organization further criticized what it described as a “double standard” in U.S. foreign policy, which condemns human rights violations in Venezuela, Cuba and Nicaragua while overlooking serious abuses committed by allies such as El Salvador, Peru and Ecuador. The report also included criticism of the U.S. military attack against Venezuela in early 2026, warning that it could strengthen Nicolás Maduro’s regime and respond primarily to U.S. political and commercial interests.
