Connect with us

International

The head of the largest unit of the Israeli Army resigns due to the failure of October 7

Commander Yossi Sariel, in charge of the intelligence unit 8200 of the Israeli Army, the largest of the armed forces, submitted his resignation this Thursday for his responsibility in the attacks of October 7, in which thousands of Palestinian militiamen led by Hamas attacked the country from Gaza and killed some 1,200 people and kidnapped another 251.

“On October 7 at 6:29 I did not fulfill the task that was expected of me, as my subordinates and commanders expected and as the citizens of the country I love so much expected of me,” begins a letter sent by Sariel to the members of unit 8200, collected by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Take responsibility

In the letter, the commander assumes responsibility for the failure of the unit that day, assuring that he failed in the understanding that the border with Gaza “demands as a system a different risk management, based on having the minimum margin of error that exists.”

Less than a month after the anniversary of the Hamas attack, Sariel submitted his resignation in agreement “with the state of the war, with the processes of consolidation of service and building resilience in the unit, as well as after the completion of the processes of the preliminary investigation into what happened.”

Leave unit 8200

Unit 8200 is the largest information collection unit of the Military Intelligence Directorate, responsible for both creating and using tools to collect, analyze, process and share information, which makes it a spearhead in the field of cyber warfare of the Israeli armed forces.

Advertisement
20260101_dengue_cubeta_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

According to a report collected by the news channel 12, the most popular Israeli network, the 8200 was in charge of designing the alert system to warn of a possible invasion of the Gaza militiamen in 2014.

Fourth senior who leaves his position

Sariel became this Thursday the fourth high-ranking official to resign from his position as a way of accounting for October 7.

Aharon Haliva, the then head of military intelligence, was the first figure of the authorities in a position of responsibility who resigned, as well as one of the few, along with the head for the southern district of Israel for the internal intelligence service -Shin Bet- and the head of the Gaza Division of the Army, General Avi Rosenfield.

Discontent among society due to the lack of performance

The lack of accountability in Israel has been a focus of discontent among society, which charges especially against the high levels of the military sector and the Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who has not assumed any kind of responsibility publicly after what happened.

In October, the head of Shin Bet, Ron Bar, apologized for what happened on October 7 and assumed his responsibility, but for the moment he is still in office.

Advertisement
20260101_dengue_cubeta_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

Although the Army is conducting an internal investigation into the failures that allowed the Hamas attack, there is no national commission of inquiry, which could target the Netanyahu government.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
20260101_dengue_balde_300x250

International

Marco Rubio launches U.S. campaign to “dismantle” the International Criminal Court

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Monday (July 13, 2026) the launch of a diplomatic campaign aimed at “dismantling” the International Criminal Court (ICC), a key institution in the global justice system, while pressuring Washington’s allies to withdraw from the organization, which he accused of interfering in U.S. affairs.

“The ICC represents an intolerable threat to American sovereignty: it claims the authority to prosecute and even imprison military personnel and officials acting in defense of the national interests of the United States,” Rubio said.

He also accused the court of waging “a war against our country, not with bullets or missiles, but with statutes, agreements and the power of what they call international law.”

The United States is not a signatory to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the ICC. The Trump administration has previously imposed sanctions on senior court officials over investigations into alleged war crimes committed by U.S. personnel in Afghanistan and actions targeting Israeli officials, a key U.S. ally.

“Step by step, if necessary”

The new State Department initiative proposes banning ICC personnel from entering the United States and expanding sanctions against court members and affiliated organizations.

Advertisement
20260101_dengue_cubeta_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The plan also includes increasing pressure on Washington’s allies, particularly countries that “benefit from the U.S. security umbrella,” to publicly reject ICC actions and distance themselves from the institution.

The Trump administration will summon foreign ambassadors and senior officials to highlight what it describes as “ICC abuses” and encourage them to withdraw from the court.

Washington also plans to increase scrutiny of countries that refuse to reject what the administration calls the ICC’s “claimed authority” while continuing to rely on U.S. assistance.

Rubio said the ICC seeks to become “a global unaccountable arbiter.” In an opinion piece published Monday in The Wall Street Journal, the secretary of state said that with the support of its allies, the United States would dismantle the ICC “step by step, if necessary.”

Advertisement
20260101_dengue_cubeta_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow
Continue Reading

International

ICE reverses course and moves forward with New Jersey migrant detention facility project

The administration of President Donald Trump has reversed course and resumed plans to convert a warehouse in New Jersey, purchased for $129.3 million, into a migrant detention facility with capacity for up to 1,500 people, according to a court filing in the state.

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) submitted a document Friday to a federal court in New Jersey stating that it will continue moving forward with plans to establish the facility in the township of Roxbury.

According to the court filing, ICE had previously informed the court on June 29 that it had decided to abandon the plan to convert the property into a detention center.

However, on July 8, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials notified attorneys that, “after reconsideration,” the agency intended to continue evaluating the renovation of the warehouse for use as a migrant detention facility.

“DHS officials further informed counsel that, as of July 10, the agency’s deliberations remain ongoing,” the document stated.

Advertisement
20260101_dengue_cubeta_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The decision to revive the project comes two weeks after The New York Times reported that ICE had decided not to proceed with plans to establish new detention facilities as part of the Trump administration’s immigration detention and deportation strategy.

According to that report, the agency had planned to sell seven warehouses, including the Roxbury property, for more than $700 million or transfer them to other federal agencies.

The New Jersey facility proposal is part of broader efforts by the Trump administration to expand immigration enforcement infrastructure amid its push to increase detention capacity and accelerate deportations of undocumented immigrants.

Continue Reading

International

Judge rules Trump’s IRS lawsuit was a “bad faith” attempt to manipulate the judicial process

A federal judge ruled Monday that a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was an attempt to “manipulate the judicial process” and determined that the case was brought in bad faith.

U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams ordered sanctions against the attorneys involved in the lawsuit, which led to an effort to create the now-defunct $1.8 billion “anti-weaponization” fund aimed at addressing alleged political targeting by government institutions in favor of Trump allies.

The lawsuit was also used to justify a government order that sought to provide Trump and his companies with immunity from any past tax-related matters.

In a 56-page opinion, Williams sharply criticized both the Department of Justice (DOJ) — saying the government’s response to the case disregarded agency policies and may have violated the law — and the private attorneys who filed the lawsuit on Trump’s behalf.

“The very nature of the lawsuit and the conduct of the parties and counsel since its filing make clear that this was an attempt to use the court to provide legitimacy to an agreement designed to grant immunity to individuals and entities connected to the president and to allocate billions of taxpayer dollars to remedy grievances that the law does not recognize,” Williams wrote.

Advertisement
20260101_dengue_cubeta_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The judge also ordered that her opinion be referred to attorney disciplinary authorities in New York and Washington, which are already reviewing previous ethics complaints involving Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche and Deputy Attorney General Stanley Woodward.

Williams criticized the Justice Department for abandoning its responsibility to defend the interests of the United States, arguing that the government entered into an agreement that departed from its position in similar legal cases, ignored DOJ policies and pursued objectives beyond what is permitted by law.

“By abandoning its responsibility to vigorously defend the interests of the United States, the government entered into an agreement that deviated from its litigation position in similar cases, ignored Department of Justice policies and achieved objectives that exceeded those authorized by law, as well as others expressly prohibited,” Williams wrote.

The judge also referred one of Trump’s private attorneys to the Florida Bar for possible disciplinary action and barred another lawyer representing the president from appearing before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida for one year.

The ruling adds another legal setback for attorneys involved in cases connected to Trump’s administration and raises new questions about the conduct of government lawyers and private counsel involved in the IRS lawsuit.

Advertisement
20260101_dengue_cubeta_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow
Continue Reading

Trending

Central News