Connect with us

International

Noboa insists on a new state of emergency in Ecuador after the previous two were invalidated

The president of Ecuador, Daniel Noboa, again decreed on Tuesday for the third time a state of emergency in part of the country’s territory, after the previous two declarations were revoked by the Constitutional Court, considering that the measure was not sufficiently argued.

This new state of emergency for 60 days covers six provinces (Guayas, Los Ríos, Manabí, Orellana, Santa Elena and El Oro) and the municipality of Camilo Ponce Enríquez, a mining enclave in the southern Andean province of Azuay where the mayor was murdered in April and this week eight bodies with signs of torture were found in a mining concession.

In these territories the measure contemplates the suspension of the rights of inviolability of the domicile, inviolability of correspondence and freedom of assembly, according to the decree, which extends for more than 50 pages to support this declaration.

It also implies the mobilization of the Armed Forces and the National Police to carry out operations against organized crime gangs, to which Noboa has declared “war” since the beginning of the year by raising the fight against them to “internal armed conflict,” with which he has come to classify them as terrorist groups and non-state belligerent actors.

The Presidency of Ecuador stressed in a statement that on this occasion the decree of the state of emergency “has the support of the World Association of Jurists (WJA, for its acronym in English),” in view of the analysis of the legality of the measure that must be carried out again by the Constitutional Court.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

On this occasion, the decree of the state of emergency establishes that the Constitutional Court may have access to secret reports from the Government authorities in case they need to review them to evaluate the relevance of the measure, without this implying the declassification and public access of them.

The Constitutional Court validated the first state of emergency decreed by Noboa at the beginning of the year and that was in force for 90 days throughout the country, broadcast as a result of a spiral of violence by criminal gangs that included simultaneous riots in several prisons in the country with about 200 hostages and the taking of the TC Television channel by a group of armed men during a live broadcast.

Subsequently, Noboa issued two focused states of emergency that covered several provinces, but in both cases the constitutunal court considered that “the facts mentioned in the decree do not specifically constitute the cause of internal armed conflict.”

The magistrates stressed that, for the most recent decree, the argument of the internal armed conflict “was the only (reason) invoked by the President of the Republic.”

“It should be remembered that, due to its important legal implications, both the reiterated jurisprudence of this Court and international law, have established that in order to configure the cause of internal armed conflict, two parameters must be considered that address the seriousness of the situation of violence,” the Court said.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

Between those two parameters cited by the court is “the level of organization of the armed group and the intensity of hostilities.”

“However, in the decree and in the reports that support it, no indications related to these parameters are mentioned,” he concluded.

However, the Court clarified that “the finding that the declaration of a state of emergency does not meet the requirements provided for in the Constitution does not imply a lack of knowledge of the serious acts of violence and the complex circumstances that the country is going through.”

He also recalled that his decision does not affect the powers provided for in the ordinary legal system for the Executive to use the Armed Forces to fulfill its constitutional mission, since the Ecuadorians approved by a large majority in a referendum held in April that the military support the Police in operations against organized crime without the need to issue states of emergency.

Organized crime gangs, mainly dedicated to drug trafficking, are credited with the wave of violence that plagues Ecuador and that has led it to be the first country in Latin America in homicides per capita, with a rate of about 47.2 per 100,000 inhabitants in 2023, according to the Ecuadorian Observatory of Organized Crime (OECO).

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow
Continue Reading
Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_300x250

Central America

U.S. and Regional Allies Back Panama Amid Dispute With China

The United States, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Guyana, Paraguay and Trinidad and Tobago issued a joint statement in support of Panama’s sovereignty, arguing that China’s recent actions represent an attempt to politicize maritime trade and undermine the sovereignty of nations in the hemisphere.

“We are closely monitoring China’s selective economic pressure and recent actions affecting vessels flying the Panamanian flag,” the statement released Tuesday said. “Panama is a pillar of our maritime trading system and, as such, must remain free from undue external pressure.”

The statement comes amid growing tensions surrounding the Panama Canal and the operation of key ports linked to global trade.

At the end of January, Panama’s Supreme Court invalidated the legal framework supporting the 1997 concession that granted Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of CK Hutchison, the right to operate the Balboa and Cristóbal terminals located on the Pacific and Atlantic entrances of the Panama Canal.

The ruling followed mounting pressure from the United States to curb Chinese influence around the strategic waterway, through which roughly 5% of global maritime trade passes.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

CK Hutchison, which managed the ports for nearly three decades, rejected the court’s decision and accused Panamanian authorities of illegally confiscating its assets. The company has launched international arbitration proceedings against Panama, seeking more than $2 billion in damages.

Following the court ruling, reports emerged of increased detentions and inspections of Panamanian-flagged vessels in China, actions widely viewed as retaliatory measures.

On Wednesday, China’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the joint statement as “completely unfounded and misleading,” accusing the United States of politicizing port operations and warning that Beijing would take steps to protect its interests in Panama.

Continue Reading

International

King Charles III Says U.S.-UK Alliance Is “Irreplaceable and Unbreakable”

King Charles III of the United Kingdom reaffirmed the strength of the British-American relationship on Tuesday during a speech before the United States Congress, describing the alliance between the two nations as “irreplaceable and unbreakable.”

The address, delivered at the Capitol, marked the first speech by a British monarch before Congress since Queen Elizabeth II in 1991 and comes at a time of political tensions between Donald Trump’s administration and the Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

“As President Trump himself observed during his state visit to Britain last autumn, the bond of kinship and identity between the United States and the United Kingdom is invaluable and eternal. It is irreplaceable and unbreakable,” the king said.

While reflecting on the upcoming 250th anniversary of U.S. independence, which will be commemorated this year, Charles III stated that the partnership between the two countries “was born out of disagreement, but is no less strong because of it.”

The monarch emphasized the democratic values shared by both nations and noted that major global changes have occurred whenever the two allies found common ground.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

“When we have found that way to agree, great changes have taken place not only for the benefit of our peoples, but for all peoples,” he said.

King Charles also quoted British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who recently described the relationship as “an indispensable alliance.”

Concluding his speech, the monarch described the shared history of the United States and the United Kingdom as “a story of reconciliation, renewal, and an extraordinary partnership.”

He added that Washington and London have forged “one of the most consequential alliances in human history.”

“I pray with all my heart that our alliance continues to defend our shared values, together with our partners in Europe, the Commonwealth, and around the world, and that we ignore calls urging us to become increasingly isolationist,” Charles III stated.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The king ended by urging both nations to “recommit to one another in selfless service to our peoples and to all peoples of the world.”

Continue Reading

International

Trump Administration Considers Denying Green Cards Over Political Views

The administration of President Donald Trump is evaluating new immigration guidelines that could deny permanent residency to immigrants based on their political views, according to a report published by The New York Times.

The proposed measures, outlined in internal Department of Homeland Security documents, would instruct immigration officials to take applicants’ public expressions and ideological positions into account when reviewing green card applications.

According to the report, cases involving “possible anti-American and/or antisemitic conduct or ideologies” would need to be referred to higher authorities for additional review.

Even if applicants have not violated any laws, authorities could still reject residency requests if they determine that individuals have “endorsed, promoted, or supported anti-American views.”

Among the factors listed in the guidelines are participation in pro-Palestinian activities, actions considered antisemitic, and the burning of the U.S. flag.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The documents reportedly describe such actions as “heavily negative” factors in immigration evaluations, potentially blocking applicants from obtaining permanent residency and, eventually, U.S. citizenship.

The directives also place particular attention on demonstrations held on university campuses following the 2023 Hamas attacks against Israel.

However, flag burning has previously been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as a form of protected free speech under the Constitution.

The proposal has sparked criticism from immigrant advocacy organizations, including the New York Immigration Coalition.

Its president, Murad Awawdeh, warned that the policies could pose a threat to fundamental rights and freedoms.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow
Continue Reading

Trending

Central News