International
The U.S. Supreme Court says that the Prosecutor’s Office overtooke itself by accusing the Capitol assailants
The United States Supreme Court decided this Friday that accusing the assailants of the January 6, 2021 Capitol of obstruction of justice was inappropriate and that the Department of Justice was overdone.
By six votes to three, the country’s highest court ruled that the Prosecutor’s Office went overboard by accusing hundreds of people who moted at the United States Capitol on January 6, 2021, of obstruction.
The decision implies that the lower courts will now apply that standard and will probably dismiss the charges against many defendants.
This ruling could also interfere in one of the judicial proceedings against former Republican President Donald Trump – that of his involvement in the assault on the Capitol and his alleged attempt to interfere in the elections – since special prosecutor Jack Smith included the obstruction of an official procedure among the four charges that weigh against him in this trial.
Although Smith, who carries out the investigation, alleges that Trump’s obstruction of the Congressional procedure is much broader than that of the assailants, it is likely that the legal team of the former president will try to take advantage of the Supreme Court’s decision.
That January 6, about 10,000 people – most of them Trump followers – marched towards the Capitol and about 800 broke into the building while Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 elections was being certified. There were five dead and about 140 officers injured.
Since then, more than 1,000 people have been arrested practically in the 50 states of the country for crimes related to the attack and more than 350 have been charged with assault or obstruction of law enforcement, according to data from the Department of Justice.
The Supreme Court decided this Friday that charges could be filed against the rioters if the prosecutors can prove that they were not only trying to enter the building by force, but also to prevent the arrival of the certificates that confirmed the results of the election.
The president of the Supreme Court, John Roberts, wrote the majority opinion, which included a liberal judge, Ketanji Brown Jackson.
Judge Amy Coney Barrett presented a dissident opinion that was joined by Judges Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan.
The Supreme Court’s decision outraged the US Prosecutor’s Office, headed by Attorney General Merrick Garland, who claimed to be “disappointed.”
This limits “an important federal statute that the Department has tried to use to ensure that those primarily responsible for that attack face the appropriate consequences,” Garland said.
Central America
U.S. and Regional Allies Back Panama Amid Dispute With China
The United States, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Guyana, Paraguay and Trinidad and Tobago issued a joint statement in support of Panama’s sovereignty, arguing that China’s recent actions represent an attempt to politicize maritime trade and undermine the sovereignty of nations in the hemisphere.
“We are closely monitoring China’s selective economic pressure and recent actions affecting vessels flying the Panamanian flag,” the statement released Tuesday said. “Panama is a pillar of our maritime trading system and, as such, must remain free from undue external pressure.”
The statement comes amid growing tensions surrounding the Panama Canal and the operation of key ports linked to global trade.
At the end of January, Panama’s Supreme Court invalidated the legal framework supporting the 1997 concession that granted Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of CK Hutchison, the right to operate the Balboa and Cristóbal terminals located on the Pacific and Atlantic entrances of the Panama Canal.
The ruling followed mounting pressure from the United States to curb Chinese influence around the strategic waterway, through which roughly 5% of global maritime trade passes.
CK Hutchison, which managed the ports for nearly three decades, rejected the court’s decision and accused Panamanian authorities of illegally confiscating its assets. The company has launched international arbitration proceedings against Panama, seeking more than $2 billion in damages.
Following the court ruling, reports emerged of increased detentions and inspections of Panamanian-flagged vessels in China, actions widely viewed as retaliatory measures.
On Wednesday, China’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the joint statement as “completely unfounded and misleading,” accusing the United States of politicizing port operations and warning that Beijing would take steps to protect its interests in Panama.
International
King Charles III Says U.S.-UK Alliance Is “Irreplaceable and Unbreakable”
King Charles III of the United Kingdom reaffirmed the strength of the British-American relationship on Tuesday during a speech before the United States Congress, describing the alliance between the two nations as “irreplaceable and unbreakable.”
The address, delivered at the Capitol, marked the first speech by a British monarch before Congress since Queen Elizabeth II in 1991 and comes at a time of political tensions between Donald Trump’s administration and the Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
“As President Trump himself observed during his state visit to Britain last autumn, the bond of kinship and identity between the United States and the United Kingdom is invaluable and eternal. It is irreplaceable and unbreakable,” the king said.
While reflecting on the upcoming 250th anniversary of U.S. independence, which will be commemorated this year, Charles III stated that the partnership between the two countries “was born out of disagreement, but is no less strong because of it.”
The monarch emphasized the democratic values shared by both nations and noted that major global changes have occurred whenever the two allies found common ground.
“When we have found that way to agree, great changes have taken place not only for the benefit of our peoples, but for all peoples,” he said.
King Charles also quoted British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who recently described the relationship as “an indispensable alliance.”
Concluding his speech, the monarch described the shared history of the United States and the United Kingdom as “a story of reconciliation, renewal, and an extraordinary partnership.”
He added that Washington and London have forged “one of the most consequential alliances in human history.”
“I pray with all my heart that our alliance continues to defend our shared values, together with our partners in Europe, the Commonwealth, and around the world, and that we ignore calls urging us to become increasingly isolationist,” Charles III stated.
The king ended by urging both nations to “recommit to one another in selfless service to our peoples and to all peoples of the world.”
International
Trump Administration Considers Denying Green Cards Over Political Views
The administration of President Donald Trump is evaluating new immigration guidelines that could deny permanent residency to immigrants based on their political views, according to a report published by The New York Times.
The proposed measures, outlined in internal Department of Homeland Security documents, would instruct immigration officials to take applicants’ public expressions and ideological positions into account when reviewing green card applications.
According to the report, cases involving “possible anti-American and/or antisemitic conduct or ideologies” would need to be referred to higher authorities for additional review.
Even if applicants have not violated any laws, authorities could still reject residency requests if they determine that individuals have “endorsed, promoted, or supported anti-American views.”
Among the factors listed in the guidelines are participation in pro-Palestinian activities, actions considered antisemitic, and the burning of the U.S. flag.
The documents reportedly describe such actions as “heavily negative” factors in immigration evaluations, potentially blocking applicants from obtaining permanent residency and, eventually, U.S. citizenship.
The directives also place particular attention on demonstrations held on university campuses following the 2023 Hamas attacks against Israel.
However, flag burning has previously been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as a form of protected free speech under the Constitution.
The proposal has sparked criticism from immigrant advocacy organizations, including the New York Immigration Coalition.
Its president, Murad Awawdeh, warned that the policies could pose a threat to fundamental rights and freedoms.
U.S. and Regional Allies Back Panama Amid Dispute With China
International Project Tackles Gender Violence in Indigenous Communities in Panama
King Charles III Says U.S.-UK Alliance Is “Irreplaceable and Unbreakable”
Tec de Monterrey honors one of its students for his contribution to nanotechnology in medicine
Defense Minister commends salvadoran soldier for Central American Cross Country victory
Extension of the state of emergency approved in southern Chile
-
International2 days ago
King Charles III Says U.S.-UK Alliance Is “Irreplaceable and Unbreakable”
-
International5 days agoU.S. allows Venezuela to fund Maduro and Cilia Flores’ legal defense
-
International3 days agoMexico Arrests CJNG Leader “El Jardinero” in Nayarit
-
Central America19 hours agoU.S. and Regional Allies Back Panama Amid Dispute With China
-
International4 days agoSuspect Armed With Shotgun and Knives Detained at White House Correspondents Dinner
-
International2 days agoTrump Administration Considers Denying Green Cards Over Political Views
-
Central America19 hours agoInternational Project Tackles Gender Violence in Indigenous Communities in Panama
-
Central America3 days agoGuatemala’s President to Hold Private Interviews for Attorney General Candidates