Connect with us

International

Israel attacked the convoy of José Andrés’ NGO by “error” believing that members of Hamas were going

Last Monday’s attack by the Israeli Army on a convoy of the NGO of chef José Andrés, World Central Kitchen, was due to a “error” in believing that two armed militiamen from Hamas were traveling in it, so two commanders involved in the operation have been dismissed by the Chief of the General Staff.

This is the conclusion of the independent investigation commissioned to the Mechanism for Investigation and Evaluation of Facts by the Israeli Army, and after it became known, the Chief of the General Staff, Herzi Halevi, has dismissed the brigade’s fire support commander, an officer with the rank of major, and the chief of the brigade, a colonel on reserve.

The commanders of both the brigade and the 162ndª division, which operates in the center of the Strip, have also been admonded.

In addition, Halevi will “formally rebold” the head of the South Command, for “his general responsibility” in the incident.

“We take seriously the serious incident that claimed the lives of seven innocent humanitarian workers. We express our deep sorrow for the loss and send our condolences to the families and the WCK organization,” he said.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

According to that investigation, Israeli forces identified two “gunmen” in the aid trucks while the convoy was heading to a warehouse in Deir al Balah, and when the vehicles left the place after unloading, “one of the commanders mistakenly assumed that the gunmen were inside the vehicles and that they were Hamas terrorists.”

The result of the investigations was presented yesterday to the Chief of Staff of the Israel Defense Forces, Herzi Halevi, and released this Friday, in which information sessions were also held with ambassadors and diplomatic corps.

“The troops did not identify the vehicles in question as associated with WCK. After an erroneous identification by the forces, they attacked the three vehicles by the NGO, based on the fact that Hamas agents were traveling in them,” the investigation states.

The attack on the humanitarian convoy of the American NGO World Central Kitchen (WCK), claimed the lives of seven of its employees: the Palestinian Saifeddin Ayad Abutaha, the Australian Lalzawmi Frankcom, the Polish Damian Soból, the Canadian-American Jacob Flickinger and the British John Chapman, James Henderson and James Kirby.

Although it was perfectly identified, the caravan was hit by three missiles fired by a drone, which was “a serious violation of the orders and standard operating procedures of the Israel Defense Forces,” the report concluded.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

“The findings of the investigation indicate that the incident should not have occurred. Those who approved the attack were convinced that their target was armed agents of Hamas and not employees of WCK,” said the FFAM, which also pointed out “errors in decision-making.”

The Israeli Army assured, on the other hand, that it considers the activity of humanitarian agencies in the Strip “of vital importance” and pledged to guarantee their security.

For the NGO World Central Kitchen, Israel “cannot credibly investigate its own failure” in the Gaza strip.

In a statement from the organization founded by Spanish chef José Andrés, it is demanded “the creation of an independent commission to investigate the murders of our colleagues from the WCK.”

“It is not enough to simply try to avoid more humanitarian deaths, which are now approaching 200,” José Andrés says in the statement.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

“It is necessary to protect all civilians and it is necessary to feed and protect all the innocent people of Gaza. And all the hostages must be released.”

For her part, Erin Gore, executive director of the NGO, pointed out that the apologies of the Israeli Army “for the scandalous murder of our colleagues represents little consolation.”

However, WCK highlighted the “important steps” taken by the Israeli Army by recognizing its responsibility and its mistakes in the deadly attack and by taking disciplinary measures against those in command.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_300x250

Central America

U.S. and Regional Allies Back Panama Amid Dispute With China

The United States, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Guyana, Paraguay and Trinidad and Tobago issued a joint statement in support of Panama’s sovereignty, arguing that China’s recent actions represent an attempt to politicize maritime trade and undermine the sovereignty of nations in the hemisphere.

“We are closely monitoring China’s selective economic pressure and recent actions affecting vessels flying the Panamanian flag,” the statement released Tuesday said. “Panama is a pillar of our maritime trading system and, as such, must remain free from undue external pressure.”

The statement comes amid growing tensions surrounding the Panama Canal and the operation of key ports linked to global trade.

At the end of January, Panama’s Supreme Court invalidated the legal framework supporting the 1997 concession that granted Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of CK Hutchison, the right to operate the Balboa and Cristóbal terminals located on the Pacific and Atlantic entrances of the Panama Canal.

The ruling followed mounting pressure from the United States to curb Chinese influence around the strategic waterway, through which roughly 5% of global maritime trade passes.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

CK Hutchison, which managed the ports for nearly three decades, rejected the court’s decision and accused Panamanian authorities of illegally confiscating its assets. The company has launched international arbitration proceedings against Panama, seeking more than $2 billion in damages.

Following the court ruling, reports emerged of increased detentions and inspections of Panamanian-flagged vessels in China, actions widely viewed as retaliatory measures.

On Wednesday, China’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the joint statement as “completely unfounded and misleading,” accusing the United States of politicizing port operations and warning that Beijing would take steps to protect its interests in Panama.

Continue Reading

International

King Charles III Says U.S.-UK Alliance Is “Irreplaceable and Unbreakable”

King Charles III of the United Kingdom reaffirmed the strength of the British-American relationship on Tuesday during a speech before the United States Congress, describing the alliance between the two nations as “irreplaceable and unbreakable.”

The address, delivered at the Capitol, marked the first speech by a British monarch before Congress since Queen Elizabeth II in 1991 and comes at a time of political tensions between Donald Trump’s administration and the Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

“As President Trump himself observed during his state visit to Britain last autumn, the bond of kinship and identity between the United States and the United Kingdom is invaluable and eternal. It is irreplaceable and unbreakable,” the king said.

While reflecting on the upcoming 250th anniversary of U.S. independence, which will be commemorated this year, Charles III stated that the partnership between the two countries “was born out of disagreement, but is no less strong because of it.”

The monarch emphasized the democratic values shared by both nations and noted that major global changes have occurred whenever the two allies found common ground.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

“When we have found that way to agree, great changes have taken place not only for the benefit of our peoples, but for all peoples,” he said.

King Charles also quoted British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who recently described the relationship as “an indispensable alliance.”

Concluding his speech, the monarch described the shared history of the United States and the United Kingdom as “a story of reconciliation, renewal, and an extraordinary partnership.”

He added that Washington and London have forged “one of the most consequential alliances in human history.”

“I pray with all my heart that our alliance continues to defend our shared values, together with our partners in Europe, the Commonwealth, and around the world, and that we ignore calls urging us to become increasingly isolationist,” Charles III stated.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The king ended by urging both nations to “recommit to one another in selfless service to our peoples and to all peoples of the world.”

Continue Reading

International

Trump Administration Considers Denying Green Cards Over Political Views

The administration of President Donald Trump is evaluating new immigration guidelines that could deny permanent residency to immigrants based on their political views, according to a report published by The New York Times.

The proposed measures, outlined in internal Department of Homeland Security documents, would instruct immigration officials to take applicants’ public expressions and ideological positions into account when reviewing green card applications.

According to the report, cases involving “possible anti-American and/or antisemitic conduct or ideologies” would need to be referred to higher authorities for additional review.

Even if applicants have not violated any laws, authorities could still reject residency requests if they determine that individuals have “endorsed, promoted, or supported anti-American views.”

Among the factors listed in the guidelines are participation in pro-Palestinian activities, actions considered antisemitic, and the burning of the U.S. flag.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The documents reportedly describe such actions as “heavily negative” factors in immigration evaluations, potentially blocking applicants from obtaining permanent residency and, eventually, U.S. citizenship.

The directives also place particular attention on demonstrations held on university campuses following the 2023 Hamas attacks against Israel.

However, flag burning has previously been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as a form of protected free speech under the Constitution.

The proposal has sparked criticism from immigrant advocacy organizations, including the New York Immigration Coalition.

Its president, Murad Awawdeh, warned that the policies could pose a threat to fundamental rights and freedoms.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow
Continue Reading

Trending

Central News