Connect with us

International

A judge admits an accusation against former Paraguayan president Mario Abdo Benítez

A judge in Paraguay admitted on Thursday the accusation against former President Mario Abdo Benítez (2018-2023) and eight officials of his administration and announced that she will ask the Upper House for the disasacharge of the political leader, who is a senator for life for having headed the Executive.

In statements to journalists, the criminal judge of guarantees Cynthia Lovera assured that, after the analysis, “the record of indictment filed by the tax agents is received and the present criminal procedure is assumed to be initiated.”

Lovera explained that hearings were set for the imposition of measures for seven former officials.

Another was the case for the former governor and his former private secretary and official deputy Mauricio Espínola, since he must previously send the request for disasaution to Congress, based on article 191 of the National Constitution, before continuing the case.

In addition, the judge set next September 11 as the date on which prosecutors must present the “conclusive requirement” at the end of the preparatory stage, which may be against or in favor of the accused.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

Abdo Benítez and the eight former officials were accused last Monday by two prosecutors for the alleged crimes of disclosure of service secrets, false declaration and simulation of a punishable act, among others, within what was described as “a scheme that aspired to generate criminal investigations against figures contrary to their movement within the Colorado Party,” including the also former president Horacio Cartes (2013-2018) and the current president of the country, Santiago Peña.

Prosecutors Aldo Cantero Colmán and Giovanni Grisetti – who this Thursday were removed from the case by the head of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, Emiliano Rolón – said they had suspicions of “the existence of punishable facts” of disclosure of service secrets, disclosure of private secrets by officials or people with special obligation, induction of a subordinate to commit a punishable act, false complaint, simulation of a punishable act, usurpation of public functions and criminal association.

The accusation fell on the former Minister of the Interior Arnaldo Giuzzio, the former holder of the National Anti-Corruption Secretariat (Senac) René Fernández and his former colleague from the Secretariat of Prevention of Money Laundering or Goods (Seprelad) Carlos Adolfo Arregui and the former deputy minister of that entity Carmen Pereira, as well as three other former officials.

The Secretary General of Congress, Antonio Sánchez, confirmed to journalists that the Legislature has already received on this day the request for disasafure from Abdo Benítez and Espínola.

Sánchez indicated that at the next session of the Chamber the request will be received, which will later be analyzed by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, National Defense and Public Forces.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The Paraguayan Constitution establishes that the respective Chamber will “examine the merit of the summary” submitted by the judge, and by a “two-thirds” majority will decide whether or not it endorses the desafuero.

The accusation against Abdo Benítez and his former officials was splashed on Wednesday by the disclosure by the local press of alleged chats between prosecutor Aldo Cantero and Pedro Ovelar, Cartes’ lawyer.

According to the newspaper ABC Color and ABC Cardinal radio, who allegedly released screenshots of the judicial official’s phone, the alleged conversations between Cantero and Ovelar took place between August and September 2023.

The images show, among others, allusions to alleged meetings between the two, the alleged sending of files from the lawyer to the prosecutor and, apparently, requests from the ombudsman on matters to be investigated.

In response, Abdo Benítez’s defense asked the Prosecutor’s Office to investigate the alleged leaked chats and to order the seizure of the cell phones and computers used in the investigation.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow
Continue Reading
Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_300x250

Central America

U.S. and Regional Allies Back Panama Amid Dispute With China

The United States, Bolivia, Costa Rica, Guyana, Paraguay and Trinidad and Tobago issued a joint statement in support of Panama’s sovereignty, arguing that China’s recent actions represent an attempt to politicize maritime trade and undermine the sovereignty of nations in the hemisphere.

“We are closely monitoring China’s selective economic pressure and recent actions affecting vessels flying the Panamanian flag,” the statement released Tuesday said. “Panama is a pillar of our maritime trading system and, as such, must remain free from undue external pressure.”

The statement comes amid growing tensions surrounding the Panama Canal and the operation of key ports linked to global trade.

At the end of January, Panama’s Supreme Court invalidated the legal framework supporting the 1997 concession that granted Panama Ports Company, a subsidiary of CK Hutchison, the right to operate the Balboa and Cristóbal terminals located on the Pacific and Atlantic entrances of the Panama Canal.

The ruling followed mounting pressure from the United States to curb Chinese influence around the strategic waterway, through which roughly 5% of global maritime trade passes.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

CK Hutchison, which managed the ports for nearly three decades, rejected the court’s decision and accused Panamanian authorities of illegally confiscating its assets. The company has launched international arbitration proceedings against Panama, seeking more than $2 billion in damages.

Following the court ruling, reports emerged of increased detentions and inspections of Panamanian-flagged vessels in China, actions widely viewed as retaliatory measures.

On Wednesday, China’s Foreign Ministry dismissed the joint statement as “completely unfounded and misleading,” accusing the United States of politicizing port operations and warning that Beijing would take steps to protect its interests in Panama.

Continue Reading

International

King Charles III Says U.S.-UK Alliance Is “Irreplaceable and Unbreakable”

King Charles III of the United Kingdom reaffirmed the strength of the British-American relationship on Tuesday during a speech before the United States Congress, describing the alliance between the two nations as “irreplaceable and unbreakable.”

The address, delivered at the Capitol, marked the first speech by a British monarch before Congress since Queen Elizabeth II in 1991 and comes at a time of political tensions between Donald Trump’s administration and the Labour government of Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

“As President Trump himself observed during his state visit to Britain last autumn, the bond of kinship and identity between the United States and the United Kingdom is invaluable and eternal. It is irreplaceable and unbreakable,” the king said.

While reflecting on the upcoming 250th anniversary of U.S. independence, which will be commemorated this year, Charles III stated that the partnership between the two countries “was born out of disagreement, but is no less strong because of it.”

The monarch emphasized the democratic values shared by both nations and noted that major global changes have occurred whenever the two allies found common ground.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

“When we have found that way to agree, great changes have taken place not only for the benefit of our peoples, but for all peoples,” he said.

King Charles also quoted British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who recently described the relationship as “an indispensable alliance.”

Concluding his speech, the monarch described the shared history of the United States and the United Kingdom as “a story of reconciliation, renewal, and an extraordinary partnership.”

He added that Washington and London have forged “one of the most consequential alliances in human history.”

“I pray with all my heart that our alliance continues to defend our shared values, together with our partners in Europe, the Commonwealth, and around the world, and that we ignore calls urging us to become increasingly isolationist,” Charles III stated.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The king ended by urging both nations to “recommit to one another in selfless service to our peoples and to all peoples of the world.”

Continue Reading

International

Trump Administration Considers Denying Green Cards Over Political Views

The administration of President Donald Trump is evaluating new immigration guidelines that could deny permanent residency to immigrants based on their political views, according to a report published by The New York Times.

The proposed measures, outlined in internal Department of Homeland Security documents, would instruct immigration officials to take applicants’ public expressions and ideological positions into account when reviewing green card applications.

According to the report, cases involving “possible anti-American and/or antisemitic conduct or ideologies” would need to be referred to higher authorities for additional review.

Even if applicants have not violated any laws, authorities could still reject residency requests if they determine that individuals have “endorsed, promoted, or supported anti-American views.”

Among the factors listed in the guidelines are participation in pro-Palestinian activities, actions considered antisemitic, and the burning of the U.S. flag.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow

The documents reportedly describe such actions as “heavily negative” factors in immigration evaluations, potentially blocking applicants from obtaining permanent residency and, eventually, U.S. citizenship.

The directives also place particular attention on demonstrations held on university campuses following the 2023 Hamas attacks against Israel.

However, flag burning has previously been recognized by the U.S. Supreme Court as a form of protected free speech under the Constitution.

The proposal has sparked criticism from immigrant advocacy organizations, including the New York Immigration Coalition.

Its president, Murad Awawdeh, warned that the policies could pose a threat to fundamental rights and freedoms.

Advertisement
20260330_renta_mh_728x90
previous arrow
next arrow
Continue Reading

Trending

Central News